avoid some more invalidations that are not necessary #49418
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Even if we have a new method that is more specific than the method it is
replacing, there still might exist an existing method that is more
specific than both which already covers their intersection.
An example of this pattern is adding
Base.IteratorSize(::Type{<:NewType})
causing invalidations on
Base.IteratorSize(::Type)
for specializations such as
Base.IteratorSize(::Type{<:AbstractString})
even though the intersection of these is fully covered already by
Base.IteratorSize(::Type{Union{}})
so our new method would never be selected there.
This won't detect ambiguities that already cover this intersection, but
that is why we are looking to move away from that pattern towards
explicit methods for detection in closer to O(n) instead of O(n^2): #49349.
Similarly, for this method, we were unnecessarily dropping it from the
MethodTable cache. This is not a significant latency problem (the cache
is cheap to rebuild), but it is also easy to avoid in the first place.
Refs #49350
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Even if we have a new method that is more specific than the method it is replacing, there still might exist an existing method that is more specific than both which already covers their intersection.
An example of this pattern is adding
Base.IteratorSize(::Type{<:NewType})
causing invalidations on
Base.IteratorSize(::Type)
for specializations such as
Base.IteratorSize(::Type{<:AbstractString})
even though the intersection of these is fully covered already by
Base.IteratorSize(::Type{Union{}})
so our new method would never be selected there.
This won't detect ambiguities that already cover this intersection, but that is why we are looking to move away from that pattern towards explicit methods for detection in closer to O(n) instead of O(n^2): #49349.
Similarly, for this method, we were unnecessarily dropping it from the MethodTable cache. This is not a significant latency problem (the cache is cheap to rebuild), but it is also easy to avoid in the first place.
Refs #49350